Atlanta Georgia Car Wreck Attorneys
Comparative negligence rule in personal injury cases - The comparative negligence rule in personal injury cases focuses on determining the total amount of damages based on the percentage of fault each party bears. In the classic case, for example, when a person is struck by a fast car, but was not wearing a seat belt, the court would find the plaintiff to be more than 50% at fault. Under the rule, however, a person can still recover damages even if he or she was partially at fault.
As the cause of action becomes a central part of a personal injury case, the insurance company may look at many aspects of the accident, including the weather, the inebriation of the drivers, the time of day the accident occurred, and the ages of the plaintiff and defendant. Every detail of the accident could influence liability and ultimately the settlement. If you or a loved one has been injured in a car accident, it is crucial that you have a car accident lawyer. In Georgia, the comparative negligence rule applies to the defendant and the plaintiff. The jury determines which party was more at fault in the accident. Each party can still recover damages even if they share some of the blame. However, their damages will be reduced accordingly. This rule does not apply to intentional injuries. As a result, personal injury lawsuits in New York must be fought meticulously. Attorney Mikel J. Hoffman is a skilled personal injury attorney who has handled many cases successfully. He offers free consultations to discuss your case.
The comparative negligence rule in personal injury cases is based on the percentage of fault that each party bears in the accident. This is a civil rule, and claims adjusters and juries must decide who is more or less at fault. The plaintiff's ability to negotiate an outcome may impact the percentage of fault that he or she receives in the damages. The court will consider evidence in order to assign fault.
Insurance company offers low settlements in auto accident cases